99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
|
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
|
+
+
|
- **f-vdiff**: port in [](fossil:3504672187af59f0) in order to be able to select the diff width based on the terminal size.
# Maybe (and Maybe Not) TODO
- **Undo** support.
- **Bring some of the configuration-related state up to date.** The infrastructure is there but the exact list of fossil-supported properties is lagging behind by several years. On the other hand, the majority of such config state is really application-specific and probably has no business being handled by this library. Some settings, e.g. `forbid-delta-manifests`, we internally honor to avoid Grief in downstream repositories. Others, such as the various globs settings, have API-level support and can be honored by the appropriate library APIs via toggles (e.g. the file-add API optionally honors the `ignore-glob` setting).
- **BOMs**. Fossil's diff APIs internally convert their inputs to UTF8 and strip the BOM (if any) from them. libf does not do that. On the one hand i'm hesitant to do so because these blobs can be anything at all (not necessarily SCM controlled). On other other, for annotate's sake it might make sense to do so automatically because the user is passing in artifact IDs instead of file content. On the other other hand, the fossil routine for doing that (blob_to_utf8_no_bom()) is far, far more involved that simply stripping a BOM. i'm torn on whether that's the library's job or not, and really dislike having to either mutate the original inputs or reallocate them to make that conversion. OTOH, fossil does so.
- **Symlinks**. i have always strongly disagreed with the addition of symlink support into fossil: platform-specific constructs simply have no place in the core of any SCM (with the "effectively necessary," as well as unobtrusive, exception of the executable bit). For platforms which don't support symlinks, fossil stores/manages them as plain text files with a single line holding the name of the referenced file. This is *very likely* the route the library will take, especially since the hassles symlink handling caused fossil in late 2020 (long story). Probably the only way the library will support proper symlinks is if someone who uses that feature adds and maintains it.
- **Backlinks**. Crosslinking "should" update the internal list of backlinks from certain text fields, but doing so requires parsing wiki/markdown-format text. See [`backlink.c` in the fossil tree](https://fossil-scm.org/home/file?name=src/backlink.c&ci=trunk) for the details. On the other hand, backlinks support only requires parsing wiki links, not the full grammar, so it might not be as painful as it initially sounds... though somewhat more for markdown, where we're required to do a multi-pass scan to handle its linking model. (We'd also need to handle verbatim blocks to avoid parsing links inside those blocks.)
- **Ticket support**. Ticket handling is surprisingly complicated, due largely to the customizability of the ticket database schema. If fossil-compatible ticket supports gets added to libfossil, it will very likely be because someone other than myself adds it! The core artifact data structure supports tickets, so the bits required for adding it are in place.
|