Fossil Forum



(1.1) By bohwaz on 2022-04-26 00:12:07 edited from 1.0 [link] [source]


(2) By Andy Bradford (andybradford) on 2022-04-26 14:04:48 in reply to 1.1 [link] [source]

> If you happen to run `fossil stash` and then exit the editor without a
> message  (because  your forgot  something  or  anything else),  fossil
> will... revert  the files,  effectively destroying  the work  you were
> trying to save

Fortunately,  Fossil isn't  as  broken  as this,  though  bad bugs  have
slipped through.  What actually happens  is that Fossil saves  the stash
without a name associated.

Try running "fossil stash list" and see if you find your missing code.


(3) By Andy Bradford (andybradford) on 2022-04-26 23:50:33 in reply to 2 [source]

I can see how this interaction could be a bit confusing. With or without
a comment, all that the "fossil  stash" command says is that it reverted
files. One may be led to believe that nothing happened. Yes, it has been
this way for a  very long time, but someone clearly  got confused by the
behavior and thought Fossil had destroyed work.

What about something like this:

$ f stash save -m ''
REVERT   file
stash 12 saved

This leaves no  room for doubt that something may  have gone wrong. Yes,
it does change the  output to be more verbose than before,  so I can see
an argument against it. Let me know what you think.


(4) By sean (jungleboogie) on 2022-04-27 02:56:08 in reply to 3 [link] [source]

I’m in favor of being more verbose, especially if it prevents the assumption files have been lost.